Learning styles at the Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva, academic period 2021
Main Article Content
Keywords
Learning styles, Active, Reflective, Theoretical and pragmatic learning style
Abstract
Objective: Identify the predominant learning styles the Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva, academic period 2021. Method: The indirect observation method was used, descriptive level, the basic type; whose population was 2781 students and with a sample of 338 from the Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva, academic period 2021. The CHAEA questionnaire of Catalina. M was used as an evaluation instrument. Alonso, Domingo J. Gallego and Peter Honey. Results: It was found that 27.5% of students present a pragmatic-reflexive style; on the other hand, we have 26.7% with a pragmatic style and 17.8% with a theoretical-pragmatic learning style. The results by faculties show that the students of the Faculties of Agronomy; Economic and administrative sciences; Accounting sciences; and Renewable Natural Resources are: pragmatic; reflective – pragmatic and theoretical – pragmatic; from the Faculty of Engineering in Food Industries, is: pragmatic; of the Faculties of Engineering in computer science and systems; electrical mechanics are: reflexive – pragmatic and pragmatic; and from the Faculty of Zootechnics, are: pragmatic and reflexive -pragmatic. Conclusion: The predominant style in the students of the Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva, is pragmatic.
References
Alonso, C., Gallego, D., y Honey, P. (1994). Los Estilos de Aprendizaje. Procedimientos de diagnóstico y Mejora. Bilbao.
Fernández, R. (2019). Estilos de aprendizaje en estudiantes de Medicina de la Universidad Walter Sisulu de Sudáfrica. Educación Médica Superior, 33(2), e1559. Epub 18 de marzo de 2020. Recuperado en 06 de diciembre de 2022, de http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo. php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864- 21412019000200003&lng=es&tlng=es.
Hernández, R. Fernández, C. y Baptista, L. (2006). Metodología de la Investigación. Editorial Mg Graw Hill.
Honey, P. y Munford, A. (1982). Using your learning styles. London: Maidenhead, Peter Honey.
Keefe, J. (1988). Profiling and Utilizing Learning Style. National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Kolb, D. (1984), Experiential learning experiences as the source of learning development. Nueva York: Prentice Hall.
Kolb, D. (1984). The Learning Style Inventory: Technical Manual. Ma.: McBer.
Martínez, J. (2011). Métodos de investigación cualitativa. Revista de la Corporación Internacional para el Desarrollo Educativo.
Reátegui, M. (2018). Estilos de Enseñanza y Estilos de Aprendizaje en la Universidad Alas Peruanas Sede Tingo María – 2014”. (Tesis de maestría, Universidad Alas Peruanas). Repositorio Institucional. http://repositorio.udh.edu. pe/handle/123456789/611
Revilla, D. (1999). Los estilos de aprendizaje. En Revista Autoeducación Año 19, N° 55
Sánchez, C. y Reyes, C. (2002). Metodología y diseños en la investigación científica. Visión universitaria.
Sánchez, C. y Reyes, C. (2009). Metodología y diseños en la investigación científica. Visión universitaria.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors will keep their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License that allows third parties to share the work whenever its author is indicated and his first publication this magazine.
Revista Boletín Redipe by Red Iberoamericana de Pedagogía is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Macklean Reátegui Guerra, National Agrarian University of the Jungle, Peru
Assistant Professor, DAHU-FCEA, National Agrarian University of La Selva.
Carmela Pajuelo Maguiña, National Agrarian University of the Jungle, Peru
Associate Professor, DAHU-FCEA, National Agrarian University of La Selva.