Correlation analysis of the energy sector and socioeconomic development: A case study of Colombia

Main Article Content

Nelson Javier Hernández Bueno
Sergio Andrés Gómez Mutis
Wilman Yesid Ardila Barbosa
Juan Sebastián Dugarte Mendoza
José Alonso Caballero Márquez
Cesar Augusto Silva Giraldo
David Andrés Suarez Suarez
Liliana Margarita Pérez Olmos
Tatiana Gualdrón Porras

Keywords

Energy consumption, Economic growth, Correlation analysis

Abstract

This article aims to examine and measure the correlation between Colombia’s energy sector and its economic growth. It utilizes historical data pertaining to the nation’s financial activities, correlation analysis, and a discussion of results were used as the methodology. The objectives were based on analyzing Colombia’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and each economic category or sector to examine the impact of this variable on the growth of each of them.


This research employs a mixed-method approach, integrating both qualitative and quantitative perspectives. From a qualitative standpoint, it involves a fundamental analysis of Colombia’s GDP behavior. From a quantitative perspective, a correlational analysis is conducted between GDP data and the growth of each sector of the Colombian economy to measure the impact. Additionally, the study has an exploratory and correlational scope as it initially involved reviewing primary, secondary, and tertiary sources of information to explore the behavior of Colombia’s GDP and its fundamental analysis.


The implemented methodology consists of four phases: (i) Analysis of Colombia’s economic growth; (ii) Economic overview by sectors of activity; (iii) Relationship of the Mining-Energy Sector in Economic Activities, and (iv) Impact of the energy sector on economic development in Colombia.


The economic sectors that impact economic growth and are part of the energy sector include petroleum and mining supply, manufacturing, and energy. The results showed that in Colombia, the commercial activity category has the highest correlation with the GDP index at 94.90%, followed by transportation services with a correlation of 94.25%. In terms of the energy sector, the Manufacturing sector had a 84.10% correlation with the GDP, energy supply activities showed a correlation of 74.23%, and petroleum and mining had a lower connection of 25.14% with the GDP


It was confirmed that the GDP is correlated with and impacts the economic sectors (branches) through the modeling of national energy consumption. By integrating independent variables that describe its behavior, an analytical tool for the sector is created. Furthermore, the correlation index of Colombia’s economic growth and the type of impact on each sector were evidenced.


The conclusions supported the hypothesis that correlation allows for identifying trends in the country’s energy consumption behavior. Future work should focus on projecting the impact of variables other than macroeconomic factors and validating scenarios.

Abstract 446 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 288

References

A. Krawiec y M. Szydłowski, «Economic growth cy- cles driven by investment delay,» Economin Modelling, vol. 67, pp. 175- 183, 2017.

A. Martínez Ortiz, Notebook 66. Estudio sobre el im- pacto de la actividad petrolera en las regiones produc- toras de Colombia. Caracterización departamental Santander, Bogotá: Fedesarrollo. Centro de investigación económica y social, 2018.

ANDI, «Colombia: 2017 balance and 2018 perspectives,» Bogotá, 2017.

ANDI, «Colombia: 2018 Balance and 2019 perspectives,» Bogotá, 2018.

ANDI, «Colombia: 2019 Balance and 2020 perspectives,» Bogotá, 2019.

ANIF, Sector transporte: desempeño 2016 y perspectivas 2017, Bogotá, 2016.

C. A. Barreto Nieto y J. Campo Robledo, «Longterm relationship between Energy consumption and GDP in Latin America: An evaluation empirical with data panel,» 2012. Enersinc, Colombia„»

C. A. Yépez, Financial intermediation, consumption dynamics, and business cycles, Economic modelling, vol. 60, pp. 231-243, 2017.

C. Gross, Explaining the (non-) causality between energy and economic growth in the U.S.—A multivariate sectoral analysis, Energy Economics, vol. 34, pp. 489-499, 2012.

C. Wang and C. Jiayu. Analyzing on the Impact Mechanism of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) to Energy Consumption,.Energy Procedia, vol. 159, pp. 515-520, 2019.

CAMACOL, Economic report 37. Balance de la acti- vidad edificadora en 2011, positivos resultados para el sector, Bogotá, 2012.

CAMACOL, Economic report 42. What is coming for the building activity, prospects for 2012 and outlook for 2013, Bogotá, 2012.

CAMACOL, Economic report 96. Panorama of the building activity in 2018, adjustment process and characteristics of the recovery, Bogotá, 2018.

CAMACOL, SENA, DANE, «Proyecto de investigación del sector de la construcción de edificaciones en Colombia» 2015.978-958-98413-1-0

CAMACOL, Economicreport54. Towardstheconsoli- dation of the building sector in Colombia. Bogotá, 2013.

Central bank of Colombia, «The fis- 13 cal deficit,» 2019. [En línea]. http://www. banrep.gov.co/es/contenidos/page/qud-ficit-fiscal. [Acceso: 20 de marzo de 2021].

Asociación Colombiana de vehículos automotores., «WE WALK: March 2018 Automotive Sector Re- port Colombia.,» 2018. [En línea]. Disponible: http://www. andemos.org/index.php/2018/04/02/ andemos- marzo-2018-informe-sectorautomotor-colombia/. [Acceso: 20 de marzo de 2021].

CONSORCIO CORPOEMA-CUSA, CARACTERIZACIÓN ENERGÉTICA DEL SECTOR RESIDENCIAL URBANO Y RURAL EN COLOMBIA. Bogotá, Marzo 2012. Disponible:https://bdigital.upme. gov.co/bitstream/001/1111/2/v.2.pdf

CREG, MINMINAS„ Reforms and objectives of the energy sector in Colombia, “ Bogotá, 2016.

D. F. Otero Prada, .El sector energéticominero y la economía colombiana, "Bucaramanga, 2012.