Voices in dialogue: Exploring truth and post-truth in school education
Main Article Content
Keywords
Critical literacy, Truth, Post-truth, Argumentation, Dialogic teaching
Abstract
This reflective article analyzes a pedagogical experience aimed at addressing truth and post-truth in the school context, with post-truth understood as the circulation of discourses that prioritize emotion, group belonging, or virality over the verification of information. Objective. To reflect on the potential of critical literacy for the construction of criteria regarding truth and post-truth in the classroom.Methodology. This study was conducted from a qualitative perspective, employing a narrative research design. This approach allowed for an in-depth understanding of the meanings constructed by participants in relation to the pedagogical experience “Superheroes of Truth”, conceived as an educational proposal mediated by dialogue and the collective, critical construction of truth. Results. The “Superheroes of Truth” pedagogical experience shows that students’ understanding of truth and post-truth was configured as a collective process, mediated by dialogue and the exchange of experiences. Through dialogical spaces, participants recognized that both concepts do not exist as fixed or finalized content, but rather as social constructions that emerge from the convergence of multiple perspectives and viewpoints. Conclusions. Addressing truth and post-truth in the school context requires a sustained pedagogical culture of dialogue and verification, in which critical literacy is consolidated as a daily practice for reading the world and strengthening school coexistence.
References
Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780429447300
Alexander, R. (2023). A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge.https://doi. org/10.4324/9781003280581
Amorós, M. (2021). Fake news: La verdad de las noticias falsas. Plataforma Editorial.
Buckingham, D. (2020). Media education in the age of misinformation. Polity Press.
Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Duncan, R. G. (2020). Education for a “post-truth” world: New directions for research and practice. Educational Researcher, 49(1), 51–60.
Creely, E. (2025). Critical literacies in upper primary in Australia (2014–2024). Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s44020-025-00086-w
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogía del oprimido (30.ª ed.). Siglo XXI Editores.
Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (2010). Alfabetización: lectura de la palabra y lectura de la realidad. Paidós. (Trabajo original publicado en 1987).
Hajisoteriou, C. (2024). Rethinking education in the light of post-truth “new” racism and xenophobia: The need for critical intercultural media and news literacy. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1349846.
Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. Routledge.
Kozyreva, A., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2020). Citizens versus the internet: Confronting digital challenges with cognitive tools. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(3), 103–156. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1529100620946707
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jarmac.2017.07.008
McGrew, S. (2024). Teaching students to evaluate online information: Evidence from classroom-based interventions. Educational Psychologist, 59(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.228943 2
McCaw, B., Ryan, M., & Lunn-Brownlee, J. (2023). Teaching for epistemic agency: Dialogic practices in uncertain knowledge contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2022.103934
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2023). Dialogue, thinking and learning in the classroom (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781003049639

