Curriculum development for EFL environments in Ecuador

Main Article Content

Boris Cristian Cadena Murga
Mónica Paulina Castillo Niama
Silvana Patricia Célleri Quinde
Deysi Lucía Damíán Tixi

Keywords

Curriculum, Curriculum Design, Pedagogical Bases, English as a Foreign Language, Curriculum Evaluation

Abstract

Education in Ecuador has been changing in the last decade. For this reason, it is necessary to modify the national curriculum to accomplish the current educational needs.  A bibliographic research was developed, in which was determined four pillar related to this relevant educational issue. Those elements were analyzed in a sequential and logical way: the social forces that impact curriculum, the educational forces that impact curriculum, the pedagogical proposal based on the communicative approach, and the evaluation instruments for curriculum design. Besides those aspects, the Common European Framework of reference and the current curriculum guidelines from the Ecuador’s Ministry of Education helped to study how effective could be the new curriculum. All this bibliographical research was analyzed to establish as conclusions that models that present a real alternative to the traditional model of education are a necessity. To give a philosophical, pedagogical and instructional leap is a must. Accepting the necessity of transforming education in Ecuador cannot be postponed. To move from the behaviorist model to the social constructivism requires the implementation of an integral process of curriculum design.

Abstract 4234 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 1681

References

Bailly, S., Devitt, S., Gremmo, M.-J., & Heyworth, F. (2014, July 18). Council of Europe. Retrieved from Education and Languages, Language Policy: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&ved=0CGkQ

Benalcázar, R. (2014, july 18). Análisis del desarrollo económico del Ecuador. Retrieved from Banco Central del Ecuador: http://www.eumed.net/cursecon/ecolat/ec/2008/au.htm

Guskey, T. (2003). Using Classroom Assessment to Maximixe Students Learning. In L. Earl, Assessment as Learning (p. vii). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, Inc.

Hall, S. (2012). Using Progress Monitoring Data. In C. Shores, Response to Intervention (pp. 65-67). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, Inc.

Kolb, D. (2014, July 21). Grad School. Retrieved from University of Leicester: http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/gradschool/training/eresources/teaching/theories/kolb

Ministerio de Educacion del Ecuador. ( 2012). Ministerio De Educacion del Ecuador. Retrieved from National English Curriculum Guidelines: http://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2013/09/Curriculum_Guidelines_EFL_100913.pdf

Opp-Beckman, L., & Klinghammer, S. (2008). Shaping the way we teach English: succesful practices around the world. Eugene: Office of English Language Programs United States Department of State.

Ornstein, A. and Hunkins, F. Curriculum: Foundations, principle and issues. (1998). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Chapter 10: Curriculum implementation.

Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. (2006, July 22). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.cambridge.org/other_files/downloads/esl/booklets/Richards-Communicative-Language.pdf

Sowell, E. (2000). Curriculum: An integrative introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Chapter 1: Overview of curriculum processes and products.

Tyler, R. W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction: Syllabus for Education 305. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Villalba, J. (2012). National English Curriculum Guidelines. Ministerio de Educacion. Quito. Ministerio de Educacion del Ecuador.