Approach to a management methodology for sustainable historic centers
Main Article Content
Keywords
Methodology, Management instruments, Sustainable historic center
Abstract
The protection of historical zones has been a process that has evolved in the last decades worldwide, and Colombia has not been unaware of this event since, since the mid-20th century, advances have been made in the development of instruments for the management and vindication of the tangible heritage of historic centers. In this way, the PEMP Special Protection and Management Plans emerge as the main instrument of action within the National Historic Centers Recovery Plan. Despite the existence of management instruments such as the PEMP, it is still incipient its application in most municipalities due to the lack of resources of the entities charged at the national level, and the lack of process management simultaneously with other instances of the municipal government, actors of the private sector and civil society.
Of the 44 historic centers declared in Colombia, only some departmental capitals have instances that develop specific tasks of direct application in the PEMP. Equally, the articulation of technical nature of the PEMP with other planning tools is scarce, even though this is the one that is in the highest hierarchy, even above the POTs. In recent researches of the group Constructed Heritage: Text and Context, it has been possible to identify some difficulties to generate synergies between the application of the PEMP and the needs of the population, which evidences the need to evaluate the relevance and effectiveness of the actions proposals in line with the impact on the community.
According to a report by the Ministry of Culture of 2015, some municipalities that have PEMP approved and implemented, already show phenomena such as high real estate pressure, incompatibility of performance criteria between regulatory bodies, dismantling between planning and regulation, increase in tertiary uses that displace the uses of housing and favor the exodus of the permanent population, among other impacts mentioned in the follow-up report. In this sense, the objective is to analyze management instruments of historical centers in Colombia, identifying the aspects to be improved taking into account that the implementation of these instruments should tend to update the functions of historic centers, preservation of existing structures and revitalization in the current context, for socio-economic development with positive balance for the local population. The results contribute in the approach to a management methodology for sustainable interventions in historic centers.
References
Herrera H., Martí J. y Molina L. Revista (2017). Rehabilitación del contenedor y expulsión del contenido: el modelo obsoleto de renovación urbana de Bogotá. En Revista Bitácora Urbano Territorial. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Sede Bogotá. Facultad de Artes Volumen 27 No. I enero - marzo 2017
Gómez Lourdes (2009). El centro histórico urbano de Camaguey, Patrimonio Mundial. Planeamiento, gestión y manejo. Revista Apuntes. Sitios de patrimonio mundial: Gestión y retos en su manejo. Volumen 22 Numero 2. Julio-diciembre 2009. Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá. Colombia.
ICOM (2008). Clarificación sobre la terminología en conservación. 15ª Conferencia Trienal en Nueva Delhi, del 22 al 26 de septiembre de 2008
Ley 1185 de 2010. República de Colombia. Ministerio de Cultura
Ley 550 de 1999. República de Colombia. Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público.
Martin G. Escovar A. (2011). Ciudades colombianas en transformación. Sociedad Colombiana de arquitectos. Editorial Planeta. Bogotá.
Niglio Olimpia (2009). San Juan de Acres (Akko), la perla del Mediterráneo. Revista Apuntes. Sitios de patrimonio mundial: gestión y retos en su manejo. Volumen 22 Numero 2. Julio-diciembre 2009. Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá. Colombia.
Perilla M., Sanchez, F. (2014). Escenarios de impacto de la Avenida Mariscal Sucre en sectores patrimoniales del centro expandido de Bogotá. En Diario de Campo Desafíos de investigación en el siglo XXI. Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca. Bogotá.
Rojas Eduardo (2004). Volver al Centro. La recuperación de áreas urbanas centrales. Banco interamericano de Desarrollo BID. Estados Unidos de América.
Sanchez, F., Perilla, M., Morales, D. (2016). Mompox, Ambalema, Honda y Neiva, ciudades puerto del rio Magdalena. Documento de investigación no publicada. Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca.
UNESCO (2007). Centros históricos para todos. Un enfoque social y humano para una revitalización sostenible.