Impact of online peer assessment and creating digital narratives: Reducing academic burnout and improving learning engagement and self-efficacy
Main Article Content
Keywords
Virtual peer assessment, Digital storytelling, Academic burnout, Learning engagement, Learning self-efficacy
Abstract
Digital technology has introduced various forms and perspectives into education, as its integration into teaching promotes more diverse and innovative approaches, which helps mitigate students’ academic burnout. With the aim of reducing this burnout and improving students’ engagement and self-efficacy in learning, as well as overcoming the limitations inherent in traditional teaching models, this study proposes to transform traditional evaluation methods— predominantly based on exam grades—into an approach that offers students multiple opportunities for expression. This approach focuses on valuing the changes and growth in students’ learning processes, fostering higherorder cognitive learning, and deepening overall learning experiences.
The project adopts a combination of online peer assessment and digital storytelling in the context of the undergraduate elective course “Whole Language Training in Spanish”, offered by the Department of Spanish Language and Literature at Providence University in Taiwan. Over the course of a semester, the study investigates how the instructor progressively integrates online peer assessment and digital storytelling into the curriculum. It also examines and analyzes the impact of this pedagogical model on students’ academic burnout, engagement, and learning self-efficacy. At the same time, it seeks to understand the challenges, transformations, and feedback experienced by students as a result of this pedagogical approach. Additionally, the study explores the difficulties and challenges that the instructor may face during the implementation of this teaching activity, as well as the strategies employed to overcome them. The research conducts an in-depth analysis of student feedback regarding this teaching method, as well as the instructor’s reflections, ultimately providing specific teaching recommendations.
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramchaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (71-81). New York: Academic Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Benmayor, R. (2008). Digital storytelling as a signature pedagogy for the new humanities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(2), 188-204.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
Chang, D.-F. (2015). Students in mass higher education: Effects of student engagement in Taiwan. In J. C. Shin, G. A. Postiglione y F. Huang (Eds.), Mass higher education development in East Asia (189-205). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Dale, E. (1946). The cone of experience. In Audio-visual methods in teaching. In Ely, D. P. & Plomp, T. (Eds.), Classic Writings on Instructional Technology (169-180). Englewood: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
Decuyper, S., Dochy, F. y Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the Dynamic Complexity of Team Learning: An Integrative Model for Effective Team Learning in Organisations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111.
Glanville, J. L. y Wildhagen, T. (2007). The measurement of school engagement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(6), 1019-1041.
Gunuc, S. y Kuzu, A. (2015). Student Engagement Scale: Development, reliability and validity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 587-610.
Kollar, I. y Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344-348.
Lai, C.-L. y Hwang, G.-J. (2015). An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students’ art design performance using handheld devices. Computers & Education, 85(2015), 149- 159.
Lai, C.-Y. (2016). Training nursing students’ communication skills with online video peer assessment. Computers & Education, 97, 21-30.
Lingard, H. C., Yip, B., Rowlinson, S. y Kvan, T. (2007). The experience of burnout among future construction professionals: A crossnational study. Construction Management and Economics, 25(4), 345-357.
Maddux, J. E. y Gosselin, J. T. (2003). Selfefficacy. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (218- 238). New York: The Guilford Press.