Application of natural language processing as an analysis technique in textual production, case of UFPSO Systems Engineering students.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Semantic analysis, Text analysis, Natural language processing, Text mining
Abstract
This research used words, phrases, sentences and paragraphs with the intention of identifying the ability that students have to transmit verbal information. To achieve this objective, quantitative descriptive research was taken into account. As an information gathering technique, a textual production workshop was applied; in which, the students wrote a short text, summary type, from the reading of a writing. Once the exercise was carried out, the analysis of the grammatical construction was carried out, using natural language processing, allowing the words to be separated into adequate sets to evaluate their intentionality. The results obtained suggest that a large part of the students have difficulty in constructing writings and that the way in which they try to express their ideas has a simple grammatical structure, preventing the communication from fulfilling the intention and the message being effective.
References
Bird, S., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009). Natural Language Processing with Python. Sebastopol: O’Reill.
Briesmaster, M., & Etchegaray, P. (2017). Pédagogique basée sur la métacognition. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 183-202.
Casado, B. (1995). Poder y Escritura en la Edad Media. Espacio, Tiempo y Forma, 143- 168.
Cassany, D. (1995). La cocina de la escritura. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Cornejo, J., Roble, M., Barrero, C., & Martín, A. (2012). Hábitos de lectura en alumnos universitarios de carreras de ciencia y de tecnología. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 155-163.
Diaz-Mendivelso, J., & Suarez-Baron, M. (2019). Análisis social aplicando técnicas de lenguaje natural a información extraída de Twitter. Scientia et Technica, 496- 503.
Djukanovic, M., Berger, C., Raidl, G., & Blum, C. (2020). An A∗ search algorithm for the constrained longest common subsequence problem. Information Processing Letters, 1-12.
Duran, C., & Rosado, A. (2018). La Comprensión Lectora y el Rendimiento Académico en Estudiantes de Ingeniería. Revista Colombiana de Tecnologías de Avanzada, 9-15.
Eisenstein, J. (2019). Introduction to Natural Language Processing. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Gay, L., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Londres: Pearson Education.
Huerta, S. (2010). Coherencia y cohesión. Herencia, 76-80.
Hurtado, L., Costa, I., Segarra, E., GarcıaGranada, F., & Sanchis, E. (2016). Traducción Automática usando conocimiento semántico en un dominio restringido. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 101-108.
Joseph, S., Hlomani, H., Letsholo, K., Kaniwa, F., & Sedimo, K. (2016). Natural Language Processing: A Review. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 207-217.
Kohan, S. (2010). Gramática para escritores y no escritores. Madrid: Alba.
Marchant, T., Lucchini, G., & Cuadrado, B. (2007). ¿Por qué Leer Bien es Importante? Asociación del Dominio Lector con Otros Aprendizajes. Psykhe, 3-16.
Martí, M., Taulé, M., Nofre, M., Marsó, L., MartínValdivia, M., & Jiménez-Zafra, S. (2016). La negación en español: análisis y tipología de patrones de negación. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 41-48.
Mota, M., Da Cunha, I., & López-Escobedo, F. (2016). Un Corpus de Paráfrasis en Español: Metodología, Elaboración y Análisis. Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada, 85-112.
Singh, R., Maurya, S., Tripathi, T., Narula, T., & Srivastav, G. (2020). Movie Recommendation System using Cosine Similarity and KNN. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 556-559.
Takase, S., Suzuki, J., & Nagata, M. (2019). Character n-Gram Embeddings to Improve RNN Language Models. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (págs. 5074-5082). Honolulu: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
Uribe, G., & Camargo, Z. (2011). Prácticas de lectura y escritura académicas en la universidad colombiana. Magis, Revista Internacional De Investigación En Educación, 317-341.
Van Dijk, T. (1980). Estructuras y funciones del discurso. Coyoacan: Siglo veintiuno.
Velásquez, T., Puentes, A., & Espinel, E. (2016). Marco Ontológico Para La Estructuración Semántica y la Recuperación de Recursos Bibliográficos Empleando Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural. Revista Colombiana de Tecnologías de Avanzada, 9-15.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors will keep their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License that allows third parties to share the work whenever its author is indicated and his first publication this magazine.
Revista Boletín Redipe by Red Iberoamericana de Pedagogía is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Claudia Marcela Durán Chinchilla, Francisco de Paula Santander University, Ocaña, Colombia
Doctor in Education, Master in Pedagogy, Specialist in Pedagogical Practice, Graduate in Linguistics. Professor at the Francisco de Paula Santander Ocaña University. Associate researcher and director of the GIFEAH research group.
Carmen Liceth García Quintero, Francisco de Paula Santander University, Ocaña, Colombia
Ms in Zoology, specialist in University teaching, Zootechnician. Professor at the Francisco de Paula Santander Ocaña University, researcher at the GIADS group.
Alveiro Alonso Rosado Gómez, Francisco de Paula Santander University, Ocaña, Colombia
MS in Software Management, Application and Development, specialist in IT project management, researcher of the GITYD group.