The multidimensional essence of recognition: Fraser and Honneth
Main Article Content
Keywords
Recognition, Complex, Multidimensional, Fraser, Honneth, School
Abstract
The article proposes a complex analysis of recognition based on the objective, intersubjective and subjective dimensions. Fraser’s theory and his proposal of justice as participatory parity ensures moral equality and the objective condition of recognition. Honneth’s theory and the moral stages offer the conditions for personal fulfillment to ensure the dimensions of subjectivity and intersubjectivity. In addition, the school setting is proposed to integrate the recognition dimensions. The article is divided into three sections. The first section presents the discussion between Fraser and Honneth about recognition. In the second section, recognition is proposed as a complex category based on multidimensionality; and the third one appears in the school space, where it is possible to integrate the different dimensions of recognition. Finally, some conclusions are presented.
References
Foucault, M. (2001). La verdad y las formas jurídicas. Editorial Gedisa.
Fraser, N. (1997). Iustitia interrupta: reflexiones críticas desde la posición” postsocialista”. Siglo del hombre editores Bogotá.
Fraser, N. (2008). Escalas de justicia. Herder Editorial.
Fraser, N. y. H., A. (2006). ¿Redistribución o reconocimiento?
Grueso, D. (2010). La especificidad filosóficopolítica de la pregunta por la justicia. In (Vol. 7, pp. 181-211): Coherencia.
Grueso, D. I. (2012). Teoría crítica, justicia y metafilosofía: la validación de la filosofía política en Nancy Fraser y Axel Honneth. Eidos(16), 70-98.
Habermas, J. (1997). La lucha por el reconocimiento en el Estado democrático de derecho (1997)[trad. de Francisco Cortés Rodas]. Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia(15), 25-50.
Honneth, A. (1997). La lucha por el reconocimiento. Barcelona: Crítica.
Keddie, A. (2012). Schooling and social justice through the lenses of Nancy Fraser [Article]. Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17508487.2012.709185
Keddie, A., & Ollis, D. (2019). Teaching for gender justice: free to be me? The Australian Educational Researcher, 46(3), 533-547.
Kohan, W. (2007). Infancia, política y pensamiento. Buenos Aires: Del Estante Editorial.
Mills, M., McGregor, G., Baroutsis, A., Te Riele, K., & Hayes, D. (2016). Alternative education and social justice: considering issues of affective and contributive justice [Article]. Critical Studies in Education, 57(1), 100-115. https://doi. org/10.1080/17508487.2016.108741 3
North, C. E. (2009). The Promise and Perils of Developing Democratic Literacy for Social Justice [Article]. Curriculum Inquiry, 39(4), 555-579. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-873X.2009.00457.x
Ocaña, A. O. (2021). Modelos educativos y tendencias pedagógicas: la pedagogía del amor. Revista Boletín Redipe, 10(3), 89-106.
Rancière, J. (2008). El maestro ignorante. Mimesis.
Taylor, C. (2001). El multiculturalismo y” la política del reconocimiento”.
Young, I. M. (2000). La justicia y la política de la diferencia (Vol. 59). Universitat de València.
Zuleta, E. (1995). Educación y democracia: un campo de combate. Fundación Estanislao Zuleta Bogotá.