Indications to create the concept "Educational knowledge distribution agent"

Main Article Content

Ma. Dolores García Perea

Keywords

Educational researcher, Knowledge distribution agent, Professional practices

Abstract

As a result of the research carried out, the first aspects built to propose the concept ‘Knowledge Distribution Agent’ (KDA) to the scientific and research community are presented, with the purpose of debating the base and structure that gives it meaning and continue building its field of action in the educational sphere. 


The researcher is the educational, social, political and intellectual actor who has the greatest possibility of receiving the KDA attribute for professional practices carried out inside and outside the educational institution where he/she works. While the former are mandatory due to the salary received and because they are considered in the contract, designation and creation agreement of the institution, the latter are freely chosen by the educational researcher based on their personal and professional concerns and are conducted out of conviction and professional ethics, even though institutional support is often minimal or absent.


The distribution of educational knowledge, in addition to the diffusion and dissemination, is a professional practice of the educational researcher, which is in crisis due to the little institutional support generated by the rationality of the administrative bureaucracy, the imperatives of the audit and the neoliberal model, without omitting questions of style, prejudice, jealousy, among others, of the personnel who carry out administrative activities.


However, there are educational researchers who successfully distribute knowledge based on professional ethics, commitment, and social and cultural responsibility, with, without, and despite institutional conditions and support.

Abstract 217 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 205

References

Benavides, C. A. (2003). Gestión del conocimiento y calidad total. Ediciones Díaz Santos y Asociación Española para la calidad, España

Beuchot, M. (1997). Tratado de hermenéutica analógica. UNAM, México

Colina, A. y Osorio, R. (2002). “Los agentes de la investigación educativa en México”. En Weiss, E. (Coord.). El campo de la investigación educativa 1993-2001. México, COMIE

Drucker, P. F. (2008). “La productividad del trabajador del conocimiento: máximo desafío”, en Gestión del capital humano. Ediciones Deusto.

García, M. D. (2012). Las nociones de formación en los investigadores. México, D. F., Castellanos Editores

García, M. D. (2021). Educational Researcher´s Professional Practices in Postgraduate Level. Journal of Modern Education Review, ISSN 2155-7993, USA January 2021, Volume 11, No. 1, pp. 69–77 Doi: 10.15341/jmer(2155- 7993)/01.11.2021/010 Ó Academic Star Publishing Company, 2021 http://www. academicstar.us

Gibbons, Limoges, Schwartzman, Scott y Trow (1997). La nueva producción del conocimiento. La dinámica de la ciencia y la investigación en las sociedades contemporáneas. Pomares-Corredor, Barcelona.

González, M. Á. (2017). Diseminación y divulgación científica. Plan de Formación del Profesorado de la Universidad de León. Zenodo.

Grondin, J. (1999). Introducción a la hermenéutoca filosófica. Barcelona, Herder

Pasquali, A. (1970). Comprender la comunicación. Caracas, Monte ávila Editores

Valhondo, D. (2003). Gestión del conocimiento. Del mito a la realidad. Editorial Díaz de losSantos, Madrid

Vergara, M. (2013). En López, M.; Sañudo, L. y Maggi. Investigaciones sobre la investigación educativa 2002-2011. ANUIES, COMIE. México, D. F. pp. 445- 499