Determination of constructs on teaching strategies for developing algebraic reasoning

Main Article Content

Susana Del Pilar Hernández Castaño https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2596-1169

Keywords

Teaching strategies, Algebraic reasoning, Teacher’s knowledge, Daily experiences, Curricular reality

Abstract

This article reports on a research project aimed at determining theoretical constructs associated with algebraic reasoning that favor the understanding of the phenomenon as it is presented in certain contexts. Here, we assumed a process-oriented from the interpretative paradigm, based on the qualitative approach, through phenomenology as a method, where codification and categorization were used as analysis procedures whose information was obtained from the application of interviews and surveys. From this emerged the input that allowed the determination of the constructs denominated “teacher’s knowledge”, “daily experiences” and “curricular reality”, as well as their knowledge, habits, and practices regarding teaching strategies involved in the development of algebraic reasoning. From here, it was possible to conclude that although teachers understand general notions about strategies, their perceptions, and practices are based on subjective representations that highlight gaps and inaccuracies in the conceptual framework of teaching strategies, due to the indistinct reference they make to components such as methods, activities, techniques, and resources.

Abstract 136 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 114

References

Blanton, M. y Kaput, J. (2004). Elementary grades students’ capacity for functional thinking. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 135–142. Recuperado de: http://emis.math.tifr.res.in/proceedings/ PME28/RR/RR033_Blanton.pdf

Blanton, M., Stroud, R., Stephens, A., Gardiner, AM, Stylianou, DA, Knuth, E. y Strachota, S. (2019). ¿Importa el álgebra temprana? La efectividad de una intervención de álgebra temprana en los grados 3 a 5. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1930-1972. R e c u p e r a d o de: https://redined.educacion.gob.es/ xmlui/bitstream/handle/11162/201422/ Putting.pdf?sequence=1

Brizuela, B. M., Blanton, M., Sawrey, K., Newman-Owens, A. y Murphy Gardiner, A. (2015). Children’s use of variables and variable notation to represent their algebraic ideas. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(1), 34-63. Recuperado de: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/ 10.1080/10986065.2015.981939

Cadavid, A. M. y Calderón P, I. C. (2006). Análisis del concepto enseñanza en las teorías curriculares de Lawrence Stenhouse y José Gimeno Sacristán. Revista Educación y Pedagogía. XVI (40). 143- 152. Recuperado de: https://revistas. udea.edu.co/index.php/revistaeyp/ article/view/6019

Chacón, E. (2004). El uso del Atlas.TI como herramienta para el análisis de datos cualitativos en investigaciones educativas. Disponible en: https:// abacoenred. com/wp-content/ uploads/2016/01/Atlas.ti-UNED-EdixonChacon-2004pdf.pdf

Chimoni, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D. y Christou, C. (2018). Examinando el pensamiento algebraico temprano: conocimientos a partir de datos empíricos. Estudios Educativos en Matemáticas, 98(1), 57-76. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/323212669_Examining_ early_algebraic_thinking_insights_ from_empirical_data

Díaz, F. y Hernández, G. (2010). Estrategias docentes para el aprendizaje significativo. Una interpretación constructiva. México: McGraw Hill.

Diaz, L., Torruco, U. Martínez, M. y Varela, M. (2013) La entrevista: Recurso flexible y dinámico. México D.F.: Revista Investigación.en Educación Médica, 2(7). 162-167. Recuperado de: https://www. redalyc.org/pdf/3497/349733228009.pdf

García, T. (2013). El cuestionario como instrumento de investigación/ evaluación. Etapas de procesoinvestigador. Recuperado de: https://www.academia.edu/8713679/ EL_CUESTIONARIO_ COMO_INSTRUMENTO_DE_ INVESTIGACI%C3%93N_ EVALUACI%C3%93N