Design of a Teacher Training Program in STEM education for intermediate cities
Main Article Content
Keywords
Teacher training, STEM Approach, Teaching competencies, Curriculum development, Educational resources
Abstract
Education STEM approach has become a space conducive to the formation of citizens with skills typical of the 21st century. For this reason, different actors have promoted its implementation in educational institutions, which makes the teacher a key actor for a relevant development of the approach. In this study, a training program in education with a STEM approach was designed, applied to a context of a demographically intermediate city. based on a qualitative-interpretative analysis, documentary and semi-structured interviews. The competencies and training needs required to successfully integrate the STEM approach were identified. The results show that the lack of technological infrastructure and the lack of training in active methodologies are critical barriers for teachers. For this reason, the program proposes modules focused on interdisciplinarity, the use of educational technologies and the contextualization of methodologies to local realities, with a constructivist approach that encourages critical reflection and self-evaluation. The study concludes that STEM teacher training should be adapted to the particular conditions of intermediary cities, and thus promote inter-institutional collaboration and pedagogical innovation in these contexts
References
Anderson, J., & Li, Y. (Eds.). (2019). Advances in STEM Education: An International Perspective. Springer.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 7–74. https:// doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi. org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What Is STEM? A Discussion About Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949- 8594.2011.00109.x
Brenner, D. (2023). Place Matters: Preparing STEM Teachers for Rural Schools. Frontiers in Education, 11(Article 560), 1–22. https:// doi.org/Insert the DOI if available
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities.
Carretero, M. (2021). Constructivismo y educación. Tilde editora.
Céspedes, R. C. L. (2016). Diseño, aplicación y evaluación de un programa de formación de profesores tutores de prácticum de centro escolar, en la carrera de pedagogía en historia y ciencias sociales de una universidad chilena. TDX (Tesis Doctorals En Xarxa), 1 recurs electrònic (350 ). http://www.tdx. cat/handle/10803/370836%0Ahttp://hdl. handle.net/2445/97222
Cianca, S. (2019). Teaching Elementary STEM Education: Unpacking Standards and Implementing Practice-Based Pedagogy. Routledge.
Clark, S., Dyar, C., Inman, E., Maung, N., & London, B. (2021). Women’s career confidence in a fixed, sexist STEM environment. International Journal of STEM Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40594-021-00313-z
Copriady, J. (2014). Teachers competency in the teaching and learning of chemistry practical. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(8), 312–318. https://doi. org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n8p312
Council, N. R. (2015). Guide to implementing the next generation science standards. National Academies Press. https://doi. org/10.17226/18802
Counsell, S. (2017). STEM Learning with Young Children: Inquiry Teaching with Ramps and Pathways. Teachers College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wechsler, M., Levin, S., Leung-Gagné, M., Tozer, S., & Campoli, A. (2023). Principal Professional Development (pp. 44–64). https://doi. org/10.4324/9781003380450-3
Davis, E. A., & Davis, B. (Eds.). (2020). Developing Teacher Leaders in STEM Education. Springer
Díaz, F., & Hernández, G. (1999). Estrategias para un aprendijzae significativo: Una interpretación constructivista. McGraw-Hill.
Dixon, J., & Nolan, E. (2019). Making Sense of Mathematics for Teaching the Small Group. Solution Tree Press.
Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Developing teachers and teaching. https://books.google.com/ books?id=TX5EBgAAQBAJ&pgis=1
English, L. D. (2016a). STEM education in the primary years to support mathematical thinking: STEM projects in an Australian setting. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi. org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-8
English, L. D. (2016b). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https:// doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
Europea, C. (2015). Educational policy recommendations for the integration of STEM. https://op.europa.eu/en/ publication-detail/-/publication
Felder, R. M., Celanese, H., & Brent, R. (2009). Active Learning: an Introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4), 1–5.
Fernández A., & G. S. (2017). Percepciones de docentes sobre la implementación de STEM en ciudades medianas. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 19(3), 45–60.
Flick, U. (2004). Investigación cualitativa: relevancia , historia y rasgos. Introducción a La Investigación Cualitativa, 16–51.
Flick, U. (2022). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com.co/ books?id=RR1tEAAAQBAJ
Gardner, K., Glassmeyer, D., & Worthy, R. (2019). Impacts of STEM Professional Development on Teachers’ Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, and Practice. Frontiers in Education, 4(April), 1–10. https://doi. org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00026
Gibbs, G. R. (2018). Analyzing Qualitative Data (Second). https://doi. org/10.4135/9781526441867
Gómez, R. L., & Suárez, A. M. (2020). Do inquiry-based teaching and school climate influence science achievement and critical thinking? Evidence from PISA 2015. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020- 00240-5
Government, A. (2018). STEM education for all young Australians: A bright future. https:// www.education.gov.au/bright-future-stemeducation
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bostiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. In Educational Technology Research and Development (Vol. 52, Issue 3, pp. 67–86). https://doi. org/10.1007/BF02504676
Hamdan, A. R., Abdul Ghafar, M. N., & Li, L. T. H. (2010). Teaching competency testing among malaysian school teachers. European Journal of Social Sciences, 12, 610–617.
Hernández J., & M. E. (2020). Educación STEM en ciudades con poblaciones intermedias: Retos y oportunidades. Revista de Educación STEM, 8(2), 45–63.
Honey, M. A., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. In STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education. In STEM Integration in K-12 Education. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
Imbernón, F. (1994). La formación y el desarrollo profesional del profesorado: hacia una nueva cultura profesional (Vol. 119). Graó.
Imbernón, F. (1998). La formación docente y el desarrollo profesional del profesorado. Hacia Una Nueva Cultura Magisterial, GRAO, Barcelona, 31.
Johnson, C. (2012). Urban teachers’ use of culturally relevant pedagogy to promote STEM education. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 8, 48– 58.
Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Moore, T. J. (Eds.). (2015). STEM Road Map: A Framework for Integrated STEM Education. Routledge.