The pedagogical relationship: A dialogical impossibility?

Main Article Content

Lina María Franco Mejía

Keywords

Pedagogical relationship, Pedagogical tact, Phronesis

Abstract

This reflective article presents the concept of Dialogical Pedagogical Relationship as the result of research from the doctoral thesis “Tact and Phronesis: Recovery of Dialogicity for the Pedagogical Relationship in Teaching.” It begins by outlining the components of the pedagogical relationship, understood from its dual aspects (symmetrical and asymmetrical). Regarding this, the concept of dialogue is explained, which supports the assertion that there is a dialogical impossibility in teaching. Finally, the article describes tact and Phronesis as conditions that make the dialogicity of the pedagogical relation possible, guiding it beyond the school environment.

Abstract 605 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 174

References

Aristóteles. (1985). Ética nicomaqueca. Ética eudemia (E. L. Iñigo, Trad.). Gredos. (Trabajo original ca. siglo IV a. C.)

Buber, M. (2013). Yo y tú. Y otros ensayos. Prometeo Libros.

Flitner, W. (1972). Manual de pedagogía general. Herder.

Gadamer, H. G. (1977). Verdad y método I (A. A. Aparicio y R. de Agapito, Trad.). Sígueme.

Nohl, H. (1959). Teoría de la educación. Lozada.

Pickup, A. (2020). Embodied Phronesis: Conceptualizing Materially Engaged Practical Wisdom in Teaching, Teacher Education, and Researech [Phronesis encarnada: Conceptualización de la sabiduría práctica materialmente comprometida en la enseñanza, la formación del profesorado y la investigación]. Journal of Though, 54(1/2), 4-22. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/26973741

Van Manen, M. (1988). El tacto en la enseñanza. El significado de la sensibilidad pedagógica. Paidós.