Methodological proposal for the analysis of academic tracks Autonomous University of Carmen, Faculty of Chemistry, Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, Mexico

Main Article Content

Heidi Angélica Salinas-Padilla
Alejandro Ruíz-Marín
Juan José Díaz-Perera
Ana Pilar Marín-Guzmán

Keywords

Academic Trajectory, Graduation Efficiency, Dropout, Academic Delay

Abstract

Universities in Mexico face various challenges related to coverage, dropout, inequality, inclusion, and educational quality. Therefore, analyzing the academic trajectories of university students is essential to improving graduation efficiency. The objective of this research was to develop a methodology that identifies indicators of graduation efficiency, dropout factors, and subject-specific failure patterns that contribute to the analysis of university students’ academic trajectories. The study was approached from an observational, longitudinal, and retrospective perspective to analyze the academic trajectories of students enrolled in the Faculty of Chemistry during the 2021–2024 period. The analysis included three academic programs: Chemical Engineering (IQ), Petroleum Engineering (IP), and Geological Engineering (IG). The results showed that promotion, as an indicator of graduation efficiency, had the greatest increase and contribution to students’ academic trajectories. Likewise, the main causes of dropout in the Faculty’s academic programs were attributed to administrative processes and regulations. These regulation-related withdrawals are strongly linked to personal or socio-emotional factors, which represent areas of opportunity for the institution. Course delays pose a comprehensive risk to student trajectories, as there are courses with high failure rates in mathematics, such as Mathematics II–III and Statics–Dynamics, as well as in chemistry during the first two years, particularly Organic I and Analytical I.

Abstract 3 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 2

References

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo BID. (2019). Inclusión educativa en América Latina y el Caribe: Estrategias y desafíos. Washington, D.C.: BID.

Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe-CEPAL. (2021). Factores determinantes de la deserción escolar en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago: CEPAL.

INEGI Tasa de abandono escolar por entidad federativa según nivel educativo, ciclos escolares seleccionados de 2000/2001 a 2023/2024, https:// www.inegi.org.mx/app/tabulados/ interactivos/?pxq=Educacion_ Educacion_11_c6aa7c65-4d89-4eaf972e-431727fc686d#:~:text=Table_ content:%20header:%20%7C%20 Entidad%20federativa%20%7C%20 Nivel,Nivel%20educativo:%20 Superior%20%7C%202022/2023:%20 11.3%20%7C consultado 27 de diciembre de 2025.

Instituto Estatal de la Educación para los Adultos. (2021). Informe de gestión 2015-2021 [Informe]. San Francisco de Campeche, Campeche. http:// campeche.inea.gob.mx/archivos/ INFORME_GESTION_2015_2021. pdf#:~:text=El%20rezago%20 educativo%20total%20en%20 el%20estado,estado%20de%20 Campeche%20(1970%2D2020)%20 en%20t%C3%A9rminos%20absolutos

Organización de Estados IberoamericanosOEI. (2020). Evaluación de la calidad educativa en América Latina y el Caribe: Avances y desafíos. Madrid: OEI.

Pérez, D. D., Caraveo, M. D. C. S., Cruz, F. C., & Téllez, A. D. R. P. (2014). Problemas relacionados con la eficiencia terminal desde la perspectiva de estudiantes universitarios. REICE: Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 12(1), 25-34.

Principales Cifras del Sistema Educativo Nacional. Dirección General de Planeación, Programación y Estadística Educativa, SEP. Primera Edición Electrónica Septiembre de 2025

Sistema de Estadísticas Continuas de Educación del Formato 911, DGPPyEE, SEP. Estadística de educación superior. Page 43. 41. Moda

UNESCO. (2022). El impacto de la COVID-19 en la educación de América Latina y el Caribe. París: UNESCO.