Syntelligentism: Education, cognition, and the humansynthetic regime

Main Article Content

Roberto José Muñoz Mujica

Keywords

Distributed intelligence, Educational theory, Syntelligent regime, Artificial intelligence in education, Educational cognition, Pedagogical governance

Abstract

This paper proposes Sinteligentismo (Syntelligentism) as a theoretical framework for understanding education in a situation that preceding educational traditions were not in a position to fully think through: the regime in which educational intelligence is distributed between human subjects and artificial intelligence systems that perform active cognitive functions. The elaboration assumes from the outset that generative AI systems operate as probabilistic models without genuine semantic understanding, but maintains that, in their structured interaction with human subjects, they produce cognitive effects that reorganize formative processes. On this basis, Sinteligentismo is constructed through two articulated operations, one conceptual and one interpretive, and is developed through an analytical apparatus of five dimensions (subjects, knowledge, processes, institutions, and purposes), four operative principles, and three contexts of manifestation. The work situates Sinteligentismo in the field of educational theories as a framework that integrates and delimits the scope of previous traditions, with particular attention to connectivism, from which it diverges in the cognitive status it attributes to non-human systems. The proposal concludes with an examination of the transformation of teaching practice in the synthetic intelligence regime, understood as a practice of reflective governance of shared intelligence.

Abstract 0 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 0

References

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A. y Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi. org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Biesta, G. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315635866

Biesta, G. (2020). Educational research: An unorthodox introduction. Bloomsbury Academic.

Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.

Clark, A. y Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi. org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. MIT Press.

Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.

Helal, M. Y. I., Elgendy, I. A., Albashrawi, M., Dwivedi, Y. K., Al-Ahmadi, M. S. y Jeon, I. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking skills: A systematic review, conceptual framework and future research directions. Information Discovery and Delivery. https://doi. org/10.1108/IDD-05-2025-0125

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.

Kumar, H., Rothschild, D., Goldstein, D. G. y Hofman, J. M. (2025). Math education with large language models: Peril or promise? Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

Macgilchrist, F., Flury, C. y Roß, A. (2025). Generative KI und das Lehramtsstudium. Erziehungswissenschaft, 36(1). https:// doi.org/10.3224/ezw.v36i1.04

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Perrenoud, P. (2004). Diez nuevas competencias para enseñar: Invitación al viaje. Graó.

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.