The english language curriculum in four public schools in Cali: a multiple case study

Main Article Content

Margareth Lorena Marmolejo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4146-6125
Carlos Alberto Mayora https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7674-5354

Keywords

curriculum, English language teaching, foreign languages, language policy

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to describe the curricular structure of the English area of four public schools in the city of Cali, Colombia. Therefore, the curricula and syllabi of these four schools were reviewed. This is a qualitative study with a flexible multiple case study design with a holistic unit of analysis using documentary analysis.



The description of each case included the pedagogical model adopted by the school, the methodological approach to language teaching, and the description of the different curricular components (goals, contents, methodology, materials and evaluation) and how each one of them is formulated and articulated. As a result, we find that there are inconsistencies between the conceptual and the practical in the curricula, lack of articulation between the different curricular components (i.e., contents that do not correspond to the goals), lack of specificity in the description of the methodology, activities and assessment techniques and instruments. There was also a partial and disjointed integration of core curricular documents such as Basic Learning Rights and the Suggested Curriculum
for English. Some implications of the findings are discussed and some recommendations are presented to strengthen the teaching of English from the institutional documents of the schools. 

Abstract 1267 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 572

References

Akbari, R. (2008). Transforming lives: introducing critical pedagogy into ELT classrooms. ELT journal, 62(3): 276-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn025

Allen, J.P. (1984). General purpose language teaching: a variable focus approach. In Brumfit, C.J. (Ed.) General purpose syllabus design (p.p. 61-74). Oxford:
Pergamon.

Bastidas, J. A. (2017). More than half a century teaching EFL in Colombia secondary schools: Tracing back our footprints to understand the present. HOW, 24(1),
10-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19183/how.24.1.348.

Cárdenas, R. & Hernández, F. (2012). Opportunity to teach and learn standards:Colombian teachers’ perspectives. Profile, 14(2): 77-94. Disponible: https://revistas.
unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/34058/40665

Cárdenas, R., Chaves, O. & Hernández, F. (2015). Implementación del programa nacional de bilingüismo. Perfiles de los docentes. Santiago de Cali: Universidad
del Valle.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Language teaching approaches: An overview. In Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 3-11).
Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Chaves, O. & Hernández, F. (2013). EFL teaching methodological practices in Cali. Profile, 15(1): 61-80. Disponible: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/
article/view/37862

Congreso de Colombia. (8 de febrero de 1994). Ley General de Educación. [Ley 115 de 1994]. DO: 41.214.

Congreso de Colombia. (11 de julio de 1994). Ley por la cual se establece el régimen de los servicios públicos domiciliarios y se dictan otras disposiciones. [Ley 142 de 1994]. DO: 41.433.

Consejo de Europa (2002). Marco común Europeo de referencia para las lenguas: Aprendizaje, enseñanza y evaluación. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura
y Deporte, Subdirección General de Cooperación Internacional.

Correa, D. y González, A. (2016). English in public primary schools in Colombia: Achievements and challenges brought about by national language education
policies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(83): 2-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2459

Dubin, F. y Olshtain, E, (1986). Course design. Developing programs and materials for language learning. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Duff, P. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Boston: Heinle & Heinle

Hall, G. (2011). Exploring English language teaching: Language in action. New York: Routledge.

Kolb, D. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. New Haven: Yale University Books.

Mayora, C. y Gutiérrez, D. (2019). Análisis del currículo del área de inglés en escuelas oficiales de Cali. Lenguaje, 47(2S), 685-707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25100/
lenguaje.v47i3.7519

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (1998). Serie lineamientos curriculares. Idioma extranjero. Bogotá: Autor. Disponible: https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/
articles-339975_recurso_7.pdf

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (2006). Guía 22. Estándares Básicos de Competencias en Lenguas Extranjeras: Inglés. Bogotá:Autor.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (2015). English, please! 1. Students’ Book. Bogotá: Richmond.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (2016a). Derechos básicos de aprendizaje de inglés. Grados transición a 5° de primaria. Bogotá: Autor.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (2016b). Derechos básicos de aprendizaje: inglés. Grados 6° a 11°. Bogotá: Auto

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (2016c). English, please! Fast Track 1. Students’Book. Recuperado de https://aprende.colombiaaprende.edu.co/sites/default/
files/naspublic/colombiabilingue/ep_sbook/student_ep1.pdf.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (2016d). Esquema curricular sugerido. Grados 6° a 11°. Bogotá: Autor.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (2016e). Instrumento de apoyo a la integración de componentes curriculares en los establecimientos educativos (PICCHME).
Recuperado de http://aprende.colombiaaprende.edu.co/ckfinder/userfiles/files/PICC-HME.pdf

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (2016f). Mallas de aprendizaje de inglés para transición a 5° de primaria. Bogotá: Autor.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (2016g). Way to Go! 6th grade. Bogotá: Richmond.

Miranda, N. (2016). Bilingual Colombia Program:Curriculum as product, only? Working papers in educational linguistics, 31(2): 19-38. Disponible: http://repository.upenn.edu/wpel/vol31/iss2/2

Murray, D. y Christison, M. (2011). What English language teachers need to know, Volume II. Facilitating learning. New York:Routledge.

Nation, I.S.P. and Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curriculum Design. New York: Routledge.

Nunan, D. (2001). Syllabus design. En M.Celce-Murcia (Ed.) Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (pp.55-65). Boston: Heinle &Heinle.

Omaggio, A.C. (1986). Teaching language in context. Proficiency oriented instruction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers, Inc.

Ramírez, R. (2008). La pedagogía crítica. Una manera ética de generar procesos educativos. Folios, 28(2): 108-119. Disponible: https://revistas.
pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/RF/article/view/6109/5065

Richards, J.C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stenhouse, L. (1987) La investigación como base de la enseñanza. Madrid: Morata

Usma, J.A. (2009). Education and language policy in Colombia: Exploring processes of inclusion, exclusion, and stratification in times of global reform. Profile, 11(1): 123-141. Disponible: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/10551

Vez, J.M. (2000). Fundamentos lingüísticos en la enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.