Evaluation of metacognitive awareness in middle school students from sciencclass

Main Article Content

Alfredo Josué Montes Leguía https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4337-200X
Armando Manuel López Hernández
Luis Carlos Pacheco Lora https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0676-9120

Keywords

Metacognitive Skills Inventory (MAI), Metacognitive Awareness, Science Education, Evaluation

Abstract

The purpose of this research work is to show the analysis of the results obtained in the application of the Metacognitive Skills Inventory (MAI) that was applied in order to investigate the similarities and differences of the metacognitive awareness of a group of 15 students of academic average from the La Victoria Educational Institution, with specific sociocultural characteristics in a science class. This is part of the initial identification of the processes that make up the impulse of metacognitive awareness, as a platform for a didactic approach. A descriptive quantitative methodology is denoted, while the MAI is a self- report test and its response options are located on a Likert scale. The results showed trends in some categories of the test and disparities in others, which were the object of reflection on the abilities that students have in terms of their metacognitive processes.

Abstract 592 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 439

References

Alama Flores, C. M. (2015). Hacia una didáctica de la metacognición Towards a didactics of the metacognitive Introducción ¿ Cómo operan las facetas o modalidades metacognitivas ? Horizonte de La Ciencia, 5(8), 77–86.

Balcikanli, C. (2011). Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for Teachers (MAIT). Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(3), 1309–1332.

Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other mysterious mechanisms. In R. H. Kluwe
W. (Ed.), Metacognition, motivation and understandin (Lawrence E, pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ.

Calero, A. (2017). Comprensión lectora. Estrategias que desarrollan lectores autorregulados. Madrid: comprension- lectora.org.

Campanario, J. M., & Moya, A. (2000). ¿Cómo enseñar ciencias? Principales tendencias y propuestas. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias: Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 17(2), 179–192.

Campo, A. & Oviedo, H. (2008). ‘Propiedades psicométricas de una escala: la consistencia interna. Revista de salud pública 10, 5, 831-839.

Cervantes, V. (2005). ‘Interpretaciones del coeficiente alpha de Cronbach’. Avances en medición 3, 9-28.

Coca Fonseca, M. A. (2020). Habilidades metacognitivas para la resolución de problemas en el contexto de la enseñanza- aprendizaje de las ciencias.

Cortina, J. (1993). ‘What is Coefficient alpha?’ Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 1, 98-104.

Domenech Auqué, M. (2004). El papel de la inteligencia y de la metacognición en la resolución de problemas. Departament de Psicología, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (UVR). Fichero de tesis.

Flavell, J. (1987). Speculations About the Nature and Development of Metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding (pp. 21– 29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gula, F., & Shehzadb, S. (2012). Relationship between metacognition, goal orientation and academic achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1864–1868.

Huertas Bustos, A. P., Vesga Bravo, G. J., & Galindo León, M. (2014a). Validación del instrumento ‘inventario de habilidades metacognitivas (Mai)’ con estudiantes colombianos. Praxis & Saber, 5(10), 55. https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.3022

Iriarte Pupo, A. J. (2019). Estrategias metacognitivas en la resolución de problemas matemáticos en estudiantes de 5o de básica primaria. In G. Poveda, Roa & Alvarado, Pinilla & Vesga (Ed.), Análisis del discurso matemático escolar. Sincelejo.

Jaramillo, S. & Osses, S. (2012). ‘Validación de un instrumento sobre metacognición para estudiantes de segundo ciclo de educación general básica’. Estudios Pedagógicos XXXVIII, 2, 117-131.

Jusi, H.; Denise, D. & Leonar, R. (2006). ‘Perceived Third-Person Effects and Consumer Attitudes on Prevetting and Banning DTC Advertis’. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 40, 1, 90-116.

Kaplan, R. & Saccuzzo, D. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles, applications and issues. Wadsworth: Thomson.

Klimenko, O., & Alvares, J. (2009). Aprender cómo aprendo: la enseñanza de estrategias metacognitivas. Educación y Educadores, 12(2). Recuperado de https:// educacionyeducadores.unisabana.edu.co/ index.php/eye/article/view/1483/1652

López-Chao, V. A., Mato-Vázquez, D., & Espiñeira, E. (2017). Impacto del uso de estrategias metacognitivas en la enseñanza de las matemáticas. Perfiles educativos, 91-111.

Nunnally, J. (1987). Teoría psicométrica. México: Trillas. Oviedo, H. & Campo, A. (2005). ‘Aproximación al uso del coeficiente de alfa de Cronbach’. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría XXXIV, 4, 2005.

Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Cognitive Strategies Instruction: From Basic Research to Classroom Instruction. In Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 265–286).

Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/ record/2006-07986-012

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.

Schraw, Gregory, & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive Theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.

Sperling, R.; Howard, B.; Miller L. & Murphy, C. (2002). ‘Measures of Children’s Knowledge and Regulation of Cognition’. Contemporary Educational Psychology 27, 51–79

Young, A., & Fry, J. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8, 1–10.