Personal Learning Environments and Complexity Theory: An Interweaving of Pedagogy and Knowledge
Main Article Content
Keywords
Personal Learning Environments (PLES), Complexity Theory, Nonlinearity, Selforganization, Educational ecosystems
Abstract
This article advances an integrative framework connecting Personal Learning Environments (PLEs) with Complexity Theory to explain learning as a dynamic, nonlinear, and adaptive phenomenon. PLEs are conceptualized as open ecosystems comprising resources, technologies, interactions, and practices that coevolve and yield emergent outcomes. Drawing on complexity principles—interconnectedness, self-organization, emergence, and adaptation— the paper explains how learners assemble and reassemble their PLEs according to contexts and goals. Pedagogical implications include curricular flexibility, the teacher’s role as mediator, promotion of learner autonomy and critical digital literacy, and purpose-driven (rather than tool-driven) technology design. The article also addresses challenges—digital divide and information overload—and outlines actions for inclusive policies and practices that support lifelong learning. Overall, it provides a conceptual synthesis and design guidance for institutions aiming to align educational innovation with complex systems thinking.
References
Adell, J., & Castañeda, L. J. (2013). Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje: claves para el ecosistema educativo en red. Editorial Marfil, S.A.
Area-Moreira, M., Hernández-Rivero, V., & SosaAlonso, J.-J. (2016). Models of educational integration of ICTs in the classroom. Comunicar, 24(47), 79–87. https://doi. org/10.3916/C47-2016-08
Area-Moreira, M., & Ribeiro-Pessoa, M. T. (2012). From Solid to Liquid: New Literacies to the Cultural Changes of Web 2.0. Comunicar, 19(38), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.3916/ C38-2012-02-01
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. IHEDUC.2011.06.002
Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064– 1069. https://doi.org/10.3109/014215 9X.2016.1173661
Gros, B. (2016). The design of smart educational environments. Smart Learning Environments, 3, 15. https://doi. org/10.1186/s40561-016-0039-x
Morin, E. (1992). From the concept of system to the paradigm of complexity. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 15(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/1061- 7361(92)90024-8
Morin, E. (1998). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Gedisa. https://books.google. com.co/books?id=ZD79QgAACAAJ
Newman, M. (2010). Networks. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001
Prigogine, I. (1997). El fin de las certidumbres. Andrés Bello.
Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Mäkitalo, K., & Sointu, E. (2020). Do we still need personal learning environments (PLEs)? Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2019.106315

